Saturday, June 28, 2008
Updated title and synopsis
How do we think about (self) organization and what does it mean in today’s art world in Asia? Trying to analyze this question, we planned a three day workshop in Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Guangzhou, to bring together twelve art-workers from different Asian countries to discuss the idea of organization. In the course of this workshop we try to find a way to come up with a common presentation at the exhibition of the Guangzhou Triennial. In line with an experimental spirit, we realize however that a workshop or seminar can never be over-planned and should not anticipate a predictable outcome. Instead of conventional conference structure and agenda, we try to focus on its space and time, in form of a journey across cities in the Pearl River Delta, which constitutes the ground work of a mobile organization of intense communication. We have however assured that the participants all are concerned with the idea of (art) organizations in some way or the other in their daily professions, be it as artists, curators or critics. In general we presume that organizations are mostly self-motivated and result of a personal interest and history imbedded in bigger local and global circumstances.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
An Artist
Being an artist can be a simple thing. If you are the sort of Vincent Van Gogh, it can be simple. No more Vincent nowadays. Maybe there are some but not me obviously. I get my works showing, then, there are many of the third parties involved. There are relationships between my works and the audience, me and the art space/ organization, etc. When I was a student, I thought that being an artist is the freest life I can have. Today I still believe in it. It is free but not free absolutely. In Hong Kong, artists are free from the market. But whatever I do, I just cannot get rid of the rules of art. I just cannot explain what the rule is as breaking the rule is already a rule to me.
Let’s forget about the metaphysical things. Recently I am preparing a show in an art gallery. I feel too tired already when preparing the draft idea, budget plan, installation draft, etc. I cannot meet the deadline of sending the images. I am so guilty about this experience, I feel like I am meeting the deadline of being an astist.
Sunday, June 22, 2008
a letter to artist participating 3rd Guangzhou Triennial from the Curators
Dear Artist,
A matter of some urgency concerns the Chinese visa application. Due to security measures during the period of the Olympics, which falls unfortunately on the Triennial's installation/manufacturing period, visas are closely scrutinised and take a much longer approval period. Please apply for your Chinese Visa as soon as possible, especially if you wish to apply for multiple entries.
As we are compiling all articles and materials for the Triennial's catalogue, we would appreciate if you could send in materials to your corresponding RC. Details as follows:
The catalogue format is 28cm by 25 cm, each artist has 4 pages on average. Each artist’s personal narration (of their Triennial projects) should be less than 500 words, with focus on the project. You should include photos (with/without sketches and plans) of this project. You should also send in an abbreviated bio of no more than 100 words, and a CV of exhibitions with a maximum of 10 entries (this includes solo shows and group exhibitions). We have already received some files for the catalogue, however, if changes need to be made, replacements should be sent before July 1st. We will leave the editing of information on artists to the corresponding RC, so please send all information to the RC for consolidation and editing.
Curators are now consolidating all the proposals, and are still in the process of planning the exhibition space. We cannot identify the space for your work at the moment, but hope to let you have more information by mid July. To help us in the process, please let us have as much information about your work/concept as possible.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.
Thanking you for your support, and looking forward to working with you,
With best regards,
Curators
Gao Shimning
Sarat Maharaj
Chang Tsong-zung
The Guangzhou Triennial 2008
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Weng's suggestions
Posted for Lee Weng Choy:
As for the format and content. I suggest that a first meeting should involve introductions, obviously, but then I think we can workshop together to see how as a group we can collectively set agendas. That to me seems to be the starting point for the whole exercise -- can you get a handful of people to sit together and come up with an agenda? Then that will determine the other meetings.
The agendas could include choosing topics to discuss; time per topic; number of presenters per topic; dividing the main group into sub-groups, etc.
The first objective of our various meetings is to think about how we as a group can work together, and to establish a process of working together. And only then should we focus on what exactly to do for the show in Sept. I wouldn't worry so much about the end result of the process, but the method of the process. At least at this stage.
Friday, June 20, 2008
What to do in those a few days?
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Book: Building (or Quarrels are a Way of Saying I Love You)
The book was an authority figure for me since young. From the earliest times, I was quite contented splitting it in two: the instructional type (e.g., textbooks, non-fiction) and the literary kind (e.g., storybooks, theoretical texts). The former was imposed by the main thrust of the science-oriented educational system, from which I benefited much and which I consciously need to unlearn. The latter, which required imagination and analysis, especially when embodied in ‘minor’ school subjects like literature and history, was much hated primarily because immensely feared by me. The lack of a reading culture at home (my parents were both hawkers) supported this forced (false) divide. On days when I deeply hated my incompetence in relaying messages and stories between my parents who had stopped talking to each other, my solace was in ploughing through piles of school textbooks, assessment books and study guides. Rote-learning was both an escape and a trap.
The building, on the other hand, was authoritative in another way – visually imposing yet unobtrusive, in fact, awesomely beautiful yet quietly confident. Far more easily grasped, objectified and represented, buildings were a subject of visual fascination. My earliest pastimes ranged from staring at construction sites, imagining and sketching the unseen foundations and basement levels, and creating hybrid buildings (thanks to science lessons on hybrid plants) on paper. This interest in the invisible, the impure and the inconsequential continues today, in my research on the ‘useless’ in architecture, particularly buildings that are unbuilt, unbuildable or no longer in use. Not having being trained in architecture is perhaps a misfortune and a blessing. I determine my time and space for engaging with it.
Victor Hugo once claimed, “This Will Kill That”, valorizing (“This”) book as a far more important and permanent record of (“That”) building than its physical, fragile realizations. It is the niches where one discipline wrestles, collides, connects with another (in my case, among the fields of writing and drawing, literature and publishing, art and architecture, urban planning and home-making) that I am particularly drawn to.
Perhaps I am restaging for my own visual pleasure, albeit in rather different forms, the tension-filled conflicts that I have failed to mediate or resolve between my parents. Hopefully, even if only temporarily or conceptually, the apparent distances between my parents, between my mum and me, between one kind of book and another, between books and buildings - start to vanish.
Michael Lee Hong Hwee
17 Jun 2008
A school
Posted for Doris Wong:
As long as I tried to talk about my personal relationship with organizations, I am confused with which kind of organizations should be talked about. I wanted to talk about something that is related to my values. In recent years the most difficult struggle to me is the teaching experience I had last year. Teaching in a high school to me is like speaking with other people's voices. Some voices from the education department, the parents, the principal, the pupils but not your own. I still remember my colleague asked me to talk about "The Last Supper" but not mentioning anything about religion. How can one learn about Western Art history without knowledge of Christianity? Because of the different Gods of the international pupils, the art history is written in a new way. I must say that I found myself not suitable to be a teacher because of all these sorts of occasions. I quitted my job because I don’t understand why the school rules stated that girls can have long hair but boys cannot. Do you guys remember that there are teachers’ comments on the exam reports? When I was the class teacher last year, I got a word file of 120 sample comments. When you comment on a pupil, you can choose from those 120 samples. I felt myself writing “Arcades Project” when finishing the reports.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
observations on institutions
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Let's start to build it.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Opening date & etc.
Participant list updated
Michael Lee Hong-Hwee, artist/curator (Hong Kong/Singapore)
Doris Wong Wai Yin, artist (Hong Kong)
Lee Kit, artist (Hong Kong)
Haegue Yang, artist (Berlin/Seoul)
Lee Weng Choy, Co-director, Sub-Station (Singapore)
Roger McDonald, Deputy Director, A.I.T. (Tokyo)
Masahiro Wada, artist (Tokyo)
Gimhongsok, artist (Seoul)
Arin Rungjang, artist (Bangkok)
Ade Darmawan, artist/ Director, ruang rupa (Jakarta)
Tobias Berger, Executive Director, Para/Site (Hong Kong)
Leung Chi Wo, artist (Hong Kong)
Saturday, June 7, 2008
Site for the Triennial
Friday, June 6, 2008
Practical info for all participants
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Asia's World City
Recently I did a bit traveling between cities in Asia and have found how eager the local government there brands the city to promote trades and tourism. Such as Hong Kong where I live, it has branded itself as the “Asia’s World City” since a few years ago. However it reads a bit bizarre, it’s more important to concentrate what it means. I understand branding as more or less a proactive move for one’s own product to establish an image, which is not equivalent to reality, something good to see in others’ lens. But then who are “we” if “we” decided to be “Asia” as well as “World”. We might even argue if this statement is just, after all it may be only a wish. Instead, I am interested to think if an Asia’s world city could really exist. How and where it could be? Even in which continent?
Not long ago, I emailed to all in my address book to ask for wishes for “Asia’s World City” and I got responses from more than 70 people, making more than 400 wishes after some repetitions. Among them are more mainstream ideas on politics, economy, education and environmental issues. There are also some weird entries, kind of personal and even imaginative, like “all female police force”, “cheap lychee martini” and “jealousy-free zones”, etc. To the art people, of course there are hot topics like “international biennale” and “museum of contemporary art” too.
In the first fortnight of September 2008, there will be vernissages of at least nine biennales or triennales in Asia. By 2015, there will be a thousand more museums in China; and a 40-plus hectare-cultural district in Hong Kong including a museum of contemporary art at size of Tate Modern. When famous museums in West are opening branches in Asia, where is “Asia”? Where is “World”? And where is “City”?